Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Sum Ltd (appointed to Lot 5) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Yorkshire.
Value band:
/
CohortSum Ltd (appointed to Lot 5)(You)Turner & Townsend Project Management LtdTetra Tech LimitedCURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITEDLeica Microsystems (UK) LimitedSkyguard Limited T/A PeopleSafe
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #1 | TT Tetra Tech Limited Peer · rank #2 | C& CURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | LM Leica Microsystems (UK) Limited Peer · rank #4 | SL Skyguard Limited T/A PeopleSafe Peer · rank #5 | SL Sum Ltd (appointed to Lot 5) (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £41.7m | £11.9m | £7.5m | £3.3m | £541k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £143k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £522.7m | £211.4m | £97.3m | £54.7m | £13.6m | £6.5m(−93%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 27 | 48 | 17 | 17 | 7 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —