Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MIDLAND LIFT SERVICES LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMIDLAND LIFT SERVICES LIMITED(You)Guideline Lift Services LimitedAmalgamated Lifts LtdCLASSIC LIFTS LTDApex Lift & Escalator Engineers LimitedMEARS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | GL Guideline Lift Services Limited Peer · rank #1 | AL Amalgamated Lifts Ltd Peer · rank #2 | CL CLASSIC LIFTS LTD Peer · rank #3 | AL Apex Lift & Escalator Engineers Limited Peer · rank #4 | ML MIDLAND LIFT SERVICES LIMITED (You) · target supplier | ME MEARS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £9.2m | £2.1m | £1.6m | £336k | £223k(−88%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £47.3m | £49.8m | £86.0m | £67.6m | £3.0m(−96%) | £4.2bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 7 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2(−33%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —