Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How LUX stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLUX(You)WPP 650Bauer Media Outdoor UK LtdRECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDSmurfit Kappa RecyclingCarlisle Security Services Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | W6 WPP 650 Peer · rank #1 | BM Bauer Media Outdoor UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | LU LUX (You) · target supplier | SK Smurfit Kappa Recycling Peer · rank #5 | CS Carlisle Security Services Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.4m | £319k | £300k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.4m | £8.3m | £12.6m | — | £25.8m | £88.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 12 | 2 | — | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —