Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How T & P Regeneration Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortT & P Regeneration Limited(You)AECOM LIMITEDOVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITEDMOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDRSK Environment LtdBUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | RE RSK Environment Ltd Peer · rank #4 | BD BUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | T& T & P Regeneration Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.8m | £77.1m | £58.7m | £5.2m | £672k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £51k | £22k | £25k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £569.4m | £1.5bn | £94.3m | £26.0m | £476k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 144 | 117 | 79 | 17 | 10 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —