Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Dakota Integrated Solutions stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortDakota Integrated Solutions(You)SoftcatReveal Media LtdQuadient UK LtdJIGSAW SYSTEMS LIMITEDStone Technologies Ltd t/a Converge Technology Solutions UK Ltd
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | RM Reveal Media Ltd Peer · rank #2 | QU Quadient UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | JS JIGSAW SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | DI Dakota Integrated Solutions (You) · target supplier | ST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £445.9m | £7.8m | £1.2m | £253k | £27k(−99%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £43.0m | £42.2m | £106.5m | £1.6m(−96%) | £10.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 466 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2(−75%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —