Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ermc limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohortermc limited(You)AECOM LIMITEDMace Consult LimitedMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdCityAxis Limited
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #2 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #4 | ER ermc limited (You) · target supplier | CI CityAxis Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £219.5m | £70.7m | £59.0m | £42.0m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £2.6m | £22k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.8m | £738.3m | £1.5bn | £521.8m | £1.1m(−100%) | £71.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 132 | 15 | 75 | 22 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —