Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MILLCAM LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortMILLCAM LIMITED(You)Kier ConstructionTJ Evers LtdOROSTREAM INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS LTDJohn Sisk and Son LtdBarnes Construction
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | TE TJ Evers Ltd Peer · rank #2 | OI OROSTREAM INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS LTD Peer · rank #3 | MI MILLCAM LIMITED (You) · target supplier | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #5 | BC Barnes Construction Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.5bn | £6.1m | £4.0m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.7bn | £23.2m | £32.9m | — | £271.7m | £80.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 40 | 1 | 1 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —