Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Hart Contractors Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHart Contractors Ltd(You)Guildmore LimitedMatthews and TannertTRIDENT MAINTENANCE SERVICES LTDArmour Hart Group LtdJP Developers Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | GU Guildmore Limited Peer · rank #1 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #2 | TM TRIDENT MAINTENANCE SERVICES LTD Peer · rank #3 | AH Armour Hart Group Ltd Peer · rank #4 | JD JP Developers Ltd Peer · rank #5 | HC Hart Contractors Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £58.8m | £6.1m | £1.7m | £42k | £31k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £631k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £305.8m | £207.7m | £248.7m | £50.5m | £98.0m | £452k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 8 | 14 | 1 | 3 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —