Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Omnicell Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 18 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortOmnicell Limited(You)SoftcatLindum Group LimitedAtamis LtdMIS Active Management Systems LimitedFrequentis (UK) Limited
iAuto-picked from 18 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | LG Lindum Group Limited Peer · rank #2 | AT Atamis Ltd Peer · rank #3 | OM Omnicell Limited (You) · target supplier | MA MIS Active Management Systems Limited Peer · rank #5 | F( Frequentis (UK) Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £469.7m | £28.8m | £18.9m | £4.6m(−81%) | £2.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £105.5m | £6.5m | £18.1m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £408.6m | £73.4m | £8.8m(−88%) | £20.8m | £32.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 490 | 46 | 11 | 7(−36%) | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —