Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SMASH Youth Project stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South West.
Value band:
/
CohortSMASH Youth Project(You)Connections Care LtdVCARE-24 LIMITEDWest HouseDDM Health LtdAge UK Gateshead
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CC Connections Care Ltd Peer · rank #1 | VC VCARE-24 LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | SY SMASH Youth Project (You) · target supplier | WH West House Peer · rank #4 | DH DDM Health Ltd Peer · rank #5 | AU Age UK Gateshead Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.2m | £817k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.4m | £817k | — | £2.7m | £3.1m | £632k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 1 | 1(−33%) | — | 2 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —