Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MW Surfacing Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMW Surfacing Limited(You)Kier ConstructionMorgan Sindall Construction and Infrastructure LimitedSACYR UK LIMITEDIntegrated Health Projects (IHP)Skanska Construction UK Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | MS Morgan Sindall Construction and Infrastructure Limited Peer · rank #2 | SU SACYR UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | IH Integrated Health Projects (IHP) Peer · rank #4 | SC Skanska Construction UK Ltd Peer · rank #5 | MS MW Surfacing Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £3.8bn | £3.7bn | £3.7bn | £3.7bn | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £5.1bn | £3.7bn | £3.7bn | £6.0bn | £16k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —