Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Attract Marketing Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAttract Marketing Ltd(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCUniversity of WarwickNaibXEWLI LIMITEDUniversity of York - Research Grants
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | UO University of Warwick Peer · rank #2 | NA Naib Peer · rank #3 | AM Attract Marketing Ltd (You) · target supplier | XE XEWLI LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | UO University of York - Research Grants Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £642.6m | £537k | £251k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | — | £266k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £20.7m | £12.2m | £14k(−100%) | £19.9m | £3.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 4 | 6 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —