Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How The Rugby Funeral Home stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortThe Rugby Funeral Home(You)Nottinghamshire Funeral Services LtdManor House Funeral Services LtdFuneral Services Ltd T/A Co-op FuneralcareFuneral Services Limited trading as CO-OP FuneralcareCooksleys Independent Funeral Services Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TR The Rugby Funeral Home (You) · target supplier | NF Nottinghamshire Funeral Services Ltd Peer · rank #2 | MH Manor House Funeral Services Ltd Peer · rank #3 | FS Funeral Services Ltd T/A Co-op Funeralcare Peer · rank #4 | FS Funeral Services Limited trading as CO-OP Funeralcare Peer · rank #5 | CI Cooksleys Independent Funeral Services Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £55k(−95%) | £1.5m | £1.1m | £1.9m | £546k | £622k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —