Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Waterloo Manor Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortWaterloo Manor Limited(You)Doro Care t/a Carieum UK LtdLeeds and York Partnership Foundation TrustImprovement & Development Agency For Local GovernmentKantar UK LimitedCounty Council Network
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DC Doro Care t/a Carieum UK Ltd Peer · rank #1 | WM Waterloo Manor Limited (You) · target supplier | LA Leeds and York Partnership Foundation Trust Peer · rank #3 | I& Improvement & Development Agency For Local Government Peer · rank #4 | KU Kantar UK Limited Peer · rank #5 | CC County Council Network Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.8m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £19.3m | — | £11.7m | £44.3m | £63.0m | £13.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 23 | — | — | 2 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —