Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Shane Connolly Flowers Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 16 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortShane Connolly Flowers Ltd(You)Mellors CateringCH&Co GroupCHARTERHOUSE VOICE & DATA LIMITEDgvav ltdPacific Computers Limited
iAuto-picked from 16 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MC Mellors Catering Peer · rank #1 | CG CH&Co Group Peer · rank #2 | CV CHARTERHOUSE VOICE & DATA LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | GV gvav ltd Peer · rank #4 | PC Pacific Computers Limited Peer · rank #5 | SC Shane Connolly Flowers Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £11.1m | £6.6m | £2.2m | £1.7m | £1.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £3k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £30.9m | £14.2m | £42.9m | £20.6m | £19.0m | £74k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —