Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How A&M Plant Hire Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortA&M Plant Hire Ltd(You)John Graham Construction LimitedTrading as GRAHAMJP Developers LtdMarlborough Highways LimitedKAEFER LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | JG John Graham Construction Limited Peer · rank #1 | TA Trading as GRAHAM Peer · rank #2 | JD JP Developers Ltd Peer · rank #3 | AP A&M Plant Hire Ltd (You) · target supplier | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #5 | KA KAEFER LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £299.7m | £25.5m | £614k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.0bn | £94.9m | £98.0m | — | £451.1m | £194.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1(−60%) | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —