Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Allman Woodcock Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 15 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAllman Woodcock Limited(You)Thomas Sinden LtdMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdPellings LLPMulalley and Company Ltd
iAuto-picked from 15 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TS Thomas Sinden Ltd Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #3 | PE Pellings LLP Peer · rank #4 | AW Allman Woodcock Limited (You) · target supplier | MA Mulalley and Company Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £258.9m | £59.0m | £42.0m | £1.5m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £22k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £665.3m | £1.5bn | £521.8m | £148.4m | £121k(−100%) | £254.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 75 | 22 | 4 | 1(−92%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —