Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How M & R Goodman Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortM & R Goodman Limited(You)Apec GroupAZOOM TAXISAzoomViaVanABC Supreme
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AG Apec Group Peer · rank #1 | AT AZOOM TAXIS Peer · rank #2 | AZ Azoom Peer · rank #3 | M& M & R Goodman Limited (You) · target supplier | VI ViaVan Peer · rank #5 | AS ABC Supreme Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.1m | £933k | £472k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £640k | £263k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1m | £7.2m | £3.6m | £1.2m(−78%) | £5.5m | £5.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 52 | 28 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —