Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ONSIDE INDEPENDENT ADVOCACY stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: West Midlands.
Value band:
/
CohortONSIDE INDEPENDENT ADVOCACY(You)NOTTINGHAM COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION LTDStrong Life Care LimitedConsensus Community Support LtdRoyal Mencap SocietyHeathcotes
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | NC NOTTINGHAM COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION LTD Peer · rank #1 | SL Strong Life Care Limited Peer · rank #2 | CC Consensus Community Support Ltd Peer · rank #3 | RM Royal Mencap Society Peer · rank #4 | HE Heathcotes Peer · rank #5 | OI ONSIDE INDEPENDENT ADVOCACY (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.2m | £1.5m | £972k | £972k | £972k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £63.1m | £3.6m | £972k | £159.9m | £20.7m | £2.1m(−90%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —