Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CRESCENDO SYSTEMS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCRESCENDO SYSTEMS LIMITED(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCIBM United Kingdom LimitedQUANTEXA LIMITEDNervecentre Software LtdHippo Digital Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | IU IBM United Kingdom Limited Peer · rank #2 | QU QUANTEXA LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | NS Nervecentre Software Ltd Peer · rank #4 | HD Hippo Digital Limited Peer · rank #5 | CS CRESCENDO SYSTEMS LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £642.6m | £499.4m | £175.0m | £61.4m | £21.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £357.6m | — | £107.3m | £56.6m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £3.6bn | £186.4m | £170.8m | £404.1m | £13.6m(−97%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 36 | 1 | 4 | 12 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —