Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Heidelberg Materials UK stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHeidelberg Materials UK(You)HOLCIM UK LIMITEDTARMAC TRADING LIMITEDM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITEDM J CHURCH (PLANT) LIMITEDMarlborough Highways Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | HU HOLCIM UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | TT TARMAC TRADING LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | HM Heidelberg Materials UK (You) · target supplier | MJ M J CHURCH (PLANT) LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £32.7m | £14.5m | £2.4m | £1.1m(−92%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £123.3m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £53.8m | £1.8bn | £125.7m | £1.1m(−100%) | £21.3bn | £451.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 77 | 49 | 8 | 1(−88%) | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —