Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Pure Audio Visual Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortPure Audio Visual Limited(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDSoftcatCACI LIMITEDFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDSTORM TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | CA CACI LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | ST STORM TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | PA Pure Audio Visual Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £528.7m | £463.9m | £47.5m | £10.5m | £10.1m | £28k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £703k | £48.1m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.2bn | £1.6bn | £158.4m | £247.2m | £67.5m | £21.0m(−91%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 33 | 474 | 29 | 19 | 3 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —