Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Rickerby Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortRickerby Limited(You)Faun Zoeller (UK) LimitedTerberg Matec UK LimitedTrest LtdM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITEDFARID HILLEND ENGINEERING LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | FZ Faun Zoeller (UK) Limited Peer · rank #1 | TM Terberg Matec UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | TR Trest Ltd Peer · rank #3 | RI Rickerby Limited (You) · target supplier | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | FH FARID HILLEND ENGINEERING LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £8.2m | £5.8m | £912k | £163k(−97%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £121.8m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £157.2m | £144.9m | £70.5m | £9.1m(−93%) | £121.8m | £85.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 12 | 2 | 1(−80%) | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —