Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Rickerby Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortRickerby Limited(You)Faun Zoeller (UK) LimitedTerberg Matec UK LimitedLister WilderFARID HILLEND ENGINEERING LIMITEDGlendale Countryside Ltd
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | FZ Faun Zoeller (UK) Limited Peer · rank #1 | TM Terberg Matec UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | LW Lister Wilder Peer · rank #3 | FH FARID HILLEND ENGINEERING LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #5 | RI Rickerby Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £12.6m | £6.4m | £1.3m | £693k | £641k | £163k(−87%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £174k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £153.9m | £144.9m | £31.1m | £85.6m | £180.4m | £9.1m(−94%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 16 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —