Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Effective Professional Interactions Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEffective Professional Interactions Ltd(You)KPMG LLPCity & County Care Services LtdDomiciliary Care Services (UK) LimitedEMBRACE HEALTHCARE LTDGlee Care Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | C& City & County Care Services Ltd Peer · rank #2 | DC Domiciliary Care Services (UK) Limited Peer · rank #3 | EH EMBRACE HEALTHCARE LTD Peer · rank #4 | GC Glee Care Ltd Peer · rank #5 | EP Effective Professional Interactions Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £323.1m | £13.1m | £13.1m | £13.1m | £13.1m | £35k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.5bn | £15.3m | £14.1m | £18.8m | £13.1m | £122k(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —