Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How AKZO NOBEL COATINGS (BLD) LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAKZO NOBEL COATINGS (BLD) LIMITED(You)Kier ConstructionUNITE PROCUREMENT UK LIMITEDTravis PerkinsCITY PLUMBING SUPPLIES HOLDINGS LIMITEDMatthews and Tannert
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | UP UNITE PROCUREMENT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | TP Travis Perkins Peer · rank #3 | CP CITY PLUMBING SUPPLIES HOLDINGS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #5 | AN AKZO NOBEL COATINGS (BLD) LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £3.1m | £3.0m | £2.1m | £1.2m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £24.8m | — | £631k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.6bn | £12.6m | £231.7m | £149.2m | £207.7m | £8.9m(−96%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —