Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MACE COST CONSULTANCY LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMACE COST CONSULTANCY LIMITED(You)PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDJacobs UK LtdAxiologik LimitedPRP
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | AX Axiologik Limited Peer · rank #4 | PR PRP Peer · rank #5 | MC MACE COST CONSULTANCY LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £334.4m | £59.0m | £47.9m | £1.7m | £762k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £14.7m | £22k | £264k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £1.5bn | £1.4bn | £49.4m | £101.6m | £13.5m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 59 | 75 | 79 | 5 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —