Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How GUARDIAN HYGIENE SERVICES LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGUARDIAN HYGIENE SERVICES LIMITED(You)Pennington Choices LimitedRhodar Industrial ServicesAsbestech LtdMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITEDASPECT CONTRACTS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC Pennington Choices Limited Peer · rank #1 | RI Rhodar Industrial Services Peer · rank #2 | AS Asbestech Ltd Peer · rank #3 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | GH GUARDIAN HYGIENE SERVICES LIMITED (You) · target supplier | AC ASPECT CONTRACTS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £28.9m | £6.5m | £2.3m | £2.0m | £133k(−94%) | £4k |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £32k | £32k | £32k | £121.0m | — | £32k |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £208.6m | £42.8m | £157.9m | £187.3m | £133k(−100%) | £120.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 25 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 1(−83%) | 6 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —