Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY(You)UCL Consultants LtdSchool-Led Development TrustIFF ResearchAmbition InstituteEducation Development Trust
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | UC UCL Consultants Ltd Peer · rank #1 | SD School-Led Development Trust Peer · rank #2 | IR IFF Research Peer · rank #3 | AI Ambition Institute Peer · rank #4 | ED Education Development Trust Peer · rank #5 | NT NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £16.4m | £11.6m | £10.4m | £9.7m | £8.7m | £351k(−97%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £58.8m | £170.2m | £10.4m | £31.3m | £8.7m | £8.9m(−71%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —