Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Local Transport Projects Limited (appointed to Lot 2) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Yorkshire.
Value band:
/
CohortLocal Transport Projects Limited (appointed to Lot 2)(You)MeridiamCAPGEMINI UK PLCCGI IT UK LIMITEDInfluential Software ServicesOVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ME Meridiam Peer · rank #1 | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #2 | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | IS Influential Software Services Peer · rank #4 | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | LT Local Transport Projects Limited (appointed to Lot 2) (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.0bn | £772.8m | £507.7m | £30.1m | £688k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £51.7m | £703k | — | £3.2m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.0bn | £4.5bn | £2.2bn | £33.3m | £13.2m | £10.4m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 47 | 32 | 3 | 10 | 1(−90%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —