Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NASSTAR MANAGED SERVICES GROUP LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNASSTAR MANAGED SERVICES GROUP LIMITED(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDPA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDACCENTURE (UK) LIMITEDCarbon60 LtdI3Works Ltd.
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | A( ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | CA Carbon60 Ltd Peer · rank #4 | I3 I3Works Ltd. Peer · rank #5 | NM NASSTAR MANAGED SERVICES GROUP LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £518.2m | £311.4m | £292.6m | £27.6m | £11.3m | £110k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | £14.7m | £703k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.2bn | £1.8bn | £5.6bn | £242.1m | £75.5m | £246k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 57 | 27 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —