Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How S & M Hostick Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortS & M Hostick Ltd(You)Peter Smythe Transport Training LimitedTTC Commercial Services LtdTeesside LGV Training LtdWS Sherburns LGV Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | S& S & M Hostick Ltd (You) · target supplier | PS Peter Smythe Transport Training Limited Peer · rank #2 | TC TTC Commercial Services Ltd Peer · rank #3 | TL Teesside LGV Training Ltd Peer · rank #4 | WS WS Sherburns LGV Ltd Peer · rank #5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | |||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £66k(0%) | £66k | £66k | £96k | £25k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | 6 | — | — | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | |||||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —