Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ORBIT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortORBIT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED(You)MOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdMASON CLARK ASSOCIATES LIMITEDAmeresco LimitedCityAxis Limited
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | MC MASON CLARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | OG ORBIT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED (You) · target supplier | AM Ameresco Limited Peer · rank #5 | CI CityAxis Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £59.0m | £42.0m | £5.3m | £127k(−100%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £22k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £521.8m | £28.6m | £2.5m(−100%) | £2.1bn | £71.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 75 | 22 | 22 | 1(−95%) | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —