Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Kinberry Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortKinberry Ltd(You)MeridiamACCENTURE (UK) LIMITEDEDF ENERGYCarbon60 LtdRefer to the attachments area
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ME Meridiam Peer · rank #1 | A( ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | EE EDF ENERGY Peer · rank #3 | CA Carbon60 Ltd Peer · rank #4 | KI Kinberry Ltd (You) · target supplier | RT Refer to the attachments area Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.0bn | £292.8m | £32.8m | £9.4m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £11.3m | £1.4m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.0bn | £5.6bn | £767.1m | £242.1m | £181k(−100%) | £2.0bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 28 | 11 | 2 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —