Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How J2 DESIGN MARKETING DIGITAL LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortJ2 DESIGN MARKETING DIGITAL LIMITED(You)ENTSERV UK LIMITEDCGI IT UK LIMITEDSoftcatHippo Digital LimitedFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EU ENTSERV UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #3 | HD Hippo Digital Limited Peer · rank #4 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | JD J2 DESIGN MARKETING DIGITAL LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.0bn | £516.5m | £450.8m | £28.4m | £10.5m | £1.2m(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £17.3m | £48.3m | £40.4m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £1.9bn | £1.6bn | £410.6m | £247.2m | £1.6m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 32 | 474 | 13 | 19 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —