Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How COMPLETE TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCOMPLETE TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED(You)AECOM LIMITEDWSP UK LimitedMace Consult LimitedGLEEDS COST MANAGEMENT LIMITEDTetra Tech Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | WU WSP UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #3 | GC GLEEDS COST MANAGEMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | TT Tetra Tech Limited Peer · rank #5 | CT COMPLETE TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £224.3m | £89.3m | £71.3m | £35.2m | £13.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £731k | — | £50.4m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £841.3m | £2.1bn | £738.8m | £335.7m | £211.4m | £367k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 147 | 161 | 19 | 28 | 52 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —