Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Utilita Field stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortUtilita Field(You)Ian WilliamsIon Property Developments LimitedBarnes ConstructionGipping Construction LtdAmeresco Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IW Ian Williams Peer · rank #1 | IP Ion Property Developments Limited Peer · rank #2 | BC Barnes Construction Peer · rank #3 | UF Utilita Field (You) · target supplier | GC Gipping Construction Ltd Peer · rank #5 | AM Ameresco Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £235.4m | £8.0m | £3.9m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £231k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.0bn | £8.4m | £80.1m | — | £12.1m | £2.1bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 23 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —