Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SMITH & BRENSON LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South West.
Value band:
/
CohortSMITH & BRENSON LIMITED(You)Morgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure LtdWates Construction LimitedLOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITEDWILLMOTT DIXON CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDGalliford Try Construction Limited
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MS Morgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure Ltd Peer · rank #1 | WC Wates Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | LP LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | WD WILLMOTT DIXON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | GT Galliford Try Construction Limited Peer · rank #5 | S& SMITH & BRENSON LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.9bn | £251.4m | £227.3m | £32.7m | £5.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £32.8m | — | — | — | £3.4m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £14.3bn | £7.1bn | £1.3bn | £37.6m | £2.1bn | £5.7m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 20 | 9 | 7 | 14 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —