Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Substrakt Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSubstrakt Ltd(You)Phoenix Software LimitedBritish Telecommunications PLCManning Gottlieb OMDExponential-e LimitedCRUNCH DMC LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #1 | BT British Telecommunications PLC Peer · rank #2 | MG Manning Gottlieb OMD Peer · rank #3 | EX Exponential-e Limited Peer · rank #4 | SU Substrakt Ltd (You) · target supplier | CD CRUNCH DMC LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £294.2m | £53.0m | £25.4m | £5.7m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £471k | £186k | — | £150k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.7bn | £2.9bn | £585.9m | £144.4m | £158k(−100%) | £8.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 223 | 33 | 4 | 4 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —