Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How PENNINE AGGREGATES LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 18 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPENNINE AGGREGATES LIMITED(You)M&J Group (Construction & Roofing) LtdEQUANS Regeneration LimitedHankinson Whittle LimitedHUWS GRAY LIMITEDStark Building Materials UK Ltd
iAuto-picked from 18 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MG M&J Group (Construction & Roofing) Ltd Peer · rank #1 | ER EQUANS Regeneration Limited Peer · rank #2 | HW Hankinson Whittle Limited Peer · rank #3 | HG HUWS GRAY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PA PENNINE AGGREGATES LIMITED (You) · target supplier | SB Stark Building Materials UK Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £288.9m | £162.1m | £31.3m | £1.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £214.4m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1bn | £2.3bn | £54.1m | £197.5m | £2.1m(−99%) | £106.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 18 | 20 | 4 | 13 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —