Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Cushman and Wakefield (DTZ ltd) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCushman and Wakefield (DTZ ltd)(You)Potter Raper PartnershipWSP UK LimitedJacobs UK LtdPerfect Circle JV LtdBloom Procurement Services
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PR Potter Raper Partnership Peer · rank #1 | WU WSP UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | PC Perfect Circle JV Ltd Peer · rank #4 | BP Bloom Procurement Services Peer · rank #5 | CA Cushman and Wakefield (DTZ ltd) (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £412.6m | £91.4m | £48.7m | £26.0m | £12.8m | £111k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £731k | £264k | £5.5m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £506.5m | £1.8bn | £1.4bn | £1.4bn | £4.8bn | £10.7m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 160 | 78 | 18 | 49 | 3 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —