Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Cushman and Wakefield (DTZ ltd) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCushman and Wakefield (DTZ ltd)(You)Deloitte LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPERNST & YOUNG LLPErnst & Young LLPLambert Smith Hampton Group Limited (trading as Ikon Consultancy
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #2 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #3 | E& Ernst & Young LLP Peer · rank #4 | LS | CA Cushman and Wakefield (DTZ ltd) (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £291.9m | £91.5m | £53.6m | £3.3m | £1.3m | £111k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £5.6m | £5.4m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.0bn | £1.1bn | £1.7bn | £3.3m | £1.3m | £10.7m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 95 | 62 | 53 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —