Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How HIGHLAND OUTDOORS LIMITED, T/A HIGHLAND DEFENCE stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: East Midlands.
Value band:
/
CohortHIGHLAND OUTDOORS LIMITED, T/A HIGHLAND DEFENCE(You)Mitie Security LimitedMitie FM LimitedQinetiQ LimitedSIEMENS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANYIRVINGQ Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MS Mitie Security Limited Peer · rank #1 | MF Mitie FM Limited Peer · rank #2 | QI QinetiQ Limited Peer · rank #3 | HO HIGHLAND OUTDOORS LIMITED, T/A HIGHLAND DEFENCE (You) · target supplier | SP SIEMENS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY Peer · rank #5 | IR IRVINGQ Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £334.1m | £288.3m | £38.4m | £100k(−100%) | £39k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £100k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1bn | £4.1bn | £3.2bn | £100k(−100%) | £93.5m | £58.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2(−60%) | 4 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —