Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How FRAZER NASH CONSULTING LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortFRAZER NASH CONSULTING LIMITED(You)Phoenix Software LimitedHippo Digital LimitedUCL Consultants LtdIpsos MoriAHR Building Consultancy Ltd
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #1 | HD Hippo Digital Limited Peer · rank #2 | UC UCL Consultants Ltd Peer · rank #3 | IM Ipsos Mori Peer · rank #4 | AB AHR Building Consultancy Ltd Peer · rank #5 | FN FRAZER NASH CONSULTING LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £293.8m | £23.9m | £7.1m | £4.2m | £4.0m | £1.3m(−82%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £471k | £40.4m | — | £4.0m | £53k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.7bn | £406.1m | £49.5m | £137.2m | £37.0m | £7.3m(−95%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 219 | 12 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —