Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How M & S Water Services (Utilities) Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortM & S Water Services (Utilities) Limited(You)Jacobs UK LtdAnglian Water Business (National) Limited T/A WaveMorgan Lambert LimitedMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITEDAnglian Water T/A Wave
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #1 | AW Anglian Water Business (National) Limited T/A Wave Peer · rank #2 | ML Morgan Lambert Limited Peer · rank #3 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | M& M & S Water Services (Utilities) Limited (You) · target supplier | AW Anglian Water T/A Wave Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £48.8m | £43.3m | £3.1m | £2.0m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £264k | — | — | £121.0m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.4bn | £2.2bn | £3.1m | £187.3m | £77k(−100%) | £2.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 77 | 6 | 5 | 4 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —