Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How RH Partnership Architects Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRH Partnership Architects Ltd(You)AECOM LIMITEDMace Consult LimitedMOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #2 | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #4 | RP RH Partnership Architects Ltd (You) · target supplier | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £221.1m | £70.8m | £59.1m | £41.7m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £2.6m | £22k | — | — | £121.8m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.0m | £738.3m | £1.5bn | £522.0m | £4.1m(−99%) | £121.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 137 | 16 | 83 | 23 | — | 5 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —