Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Ecovigour Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEcovigour Ltd(You)Hinko Construction LtdLister Wilderidverde LimitedMarlborough Highways LimitedTreehab Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | HC Hinko Construction Ltd Peer · rank #1 | LW Lister Wilder Peer · rank #2 | ID idverde Limited Peer · rank #3 | EC Ecovigour Ltd (You) · target supplier | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #5 | TR Treehab Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.6m | £1.3m | £1.0m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £32.5m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £63.5m | £31.1m | £494.4m | £174k(−100%) | £451.1m | £4.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 7 | 8 | 13 | 1(−87%) | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —