Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Pickle Jar Communications Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 15 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPickle Jar Communications Limited(You)SoftcatMatrix SCM LimitedOgilvy and Mather GroupGI Recruitment LimitedViaVan
iAuto-picked from 15 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #2 | PJ Pickle Jar Communications Limited (You) · target supplier | OA Ogilvy and Mather Group Peer · rank #4 | GR GI Recruitment Limited Peer · rank #5 | VI ViaVan Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £443.8m | £19.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | £125k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £1.7bn | £423k(−100%) | £9.1m | £298.7m | £5.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 463 | 10 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —