Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How JOHNSON & SMITH (LINCOLN) LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortJOHNSON & SMITH (LINCOLN) LIMITED(You)Willmott Dixon Construction LimitedBAM Construction LtdIan WilliamsTopcoat Construction Limited / TCL GroupJohn Sisk and Son Ltd
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WD Willmott Dixon Construction Limited Peer · rank #1 | BC BAM Construction Ltd Peer · rank #2 | IW Ian Williams Peer · rank #3 | TC Topcoat Construction Limited / TCL Group Peer · rank #4 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #5 | J& JOHNSON & SMITH (LINCOLN) LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.2bn | £408.3m | £235.3m | £86.7m | £4.6m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £26.5m | — | £231k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £11.8bn | £2.6bn | £1.0bn | £153.8m | £271.7m | £2.8m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 44 | 16 | 27 | 6 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —