Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Silverfish stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSilverfish(You)Marcon Fit-Out LtdWorkhaus Projects LtdThe Hub Consulting LimitedSETWORKS LIMITEDHU Media Ltd
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SI Silverfish (You) · target supplier | MF Marcon Fit-Out Ltd Peer · rank #2 | WP Workhaus Projects Ltd Peer · rank #3 | TH The Hub Consulting Limited Peer · rank #4 | SE SETWORKS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | HM HU Media Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £68k(−98%) | £5.5m | £2.9m | £7.2m | £1.9m | £180k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —