Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How HEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortHEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP(You)NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCHINFORMED SOLUTIONS LIMITEDIpsos (Market Research) LtdSUSTENIC LIMITEDViable Data
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | NC NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH Peer · rank #1 | IS INFORMED SOLUTIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | I( Ipsos (Market Research) Ltd Peer · rank #3 | HQ HEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP (You) · target supplier | SU SUSTENIC LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | VD Viable Data Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £24.0m | £18.8m | £14.8m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48k | £800k | £600k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £209.6m | £199.5m | £96.7m | £306k(−100%) | £2.7m | £11.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 17 | 12 | 36 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —