Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MMC Facility Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMMC Facility Ltd(You)MEARS LIMITEDKONE PLCGuideline Lift Services LimitedAmalgamated Lifts LtdApex Lift & Escalator Engineers Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ME MEARS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | KO KONE PLC Peer · rank #2 | GL Guideline Lift Services Limited Peer · rank #3 | AL Amalgamated Lifts Ltd Peer · rank #4 | AL Apex Lift & Escalator Engineers Limited Peer · rank #5 | MF MMC Facility Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £29.5m | £4.0m | £1.2m | £503k | £336k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £30.5m | £39.3m | £47.7m | £29.5m | £6k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —